JPEG vs AVIF
JPEG is fast and universal. AVIF can be significantly smaller at similar quality, but encoding is slower and compatibility can require fallbacks.
Last updated: 2026-03-18
JPEG is fast and universal. AVIF can be significantly smaller at similar quality, but encoding is slower and compatibility can require fallbacks. For most projects, JPEG is the recommended default.
Key differences
| Topic | JPEG | AVIF |
|---|---|---|
| Typical size | Larger | Smaller |
| Encode speed | Fast | Slower |
| Fallback needs | Rare | Sometimes |
When to use JPEG
- Universal delivery
- Fast encodes
- Simple compatibility
When to use AVIF
- Aggressive size reduction
- Photo-heavy pages
- Build-time optimization
Our recommendation
For most web projects, use JPEG. JPEG is best for universal delivery. Choose AVIF when aggressive size reduction.
Convert between them
Frequently asked questions
- What is the difference between JPEG and AVIF?
- JPEG is fast and universal. AVIF can be significantly smaller at similar quality, but encoding is slower and compatibility can require fallbacks.
- Should I use JPEG or AVIF?
- For most use cases, JPEG is the recommended default. Use JPEG when: universal delivery, fast encodes, simple compatibility. Use AVIF when: aggressive size reduction, photo-heavy pages, build-time optimization.
- Can I convert between JPEG and AVIF?
- Yes. Use optimo to convert between them with a single command. Run "npx optimo file --format avif" to convert from JPEG to AVIF.